At-Bay vs Hippo Insurance — Underwriting workstation for US insurance, 2026.
At-Bay (3 named carriers) and Hippo Insurance (9 named carriers) both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.
Last verified 2026-04-22 · methodology
TL;DR
- At-Bay has 3 publicly-named carrier deployments; Hippo Insurance has 9. Both at the underwriting workstation layer.
- Zero customer overlap in the public roster. At-Bay and Hippo Insurance are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Both classified ai-native on Phidea's generation axis.
- Ownership contrast: At-Bay is independently held; Hippo Insurance is public (NYSE: HIPO).
- Analyst coverage: 1 firm cover both, 2 only At-Bay, 4 only Hippo Insurance.
Customer overlap
| Bucket | Count |
|---|---|
| Named on At-Bay only | 3 |
| Named on Hippo Insurance only | 9 |
| Named on both | 0 |
| of which US-named on at least one side | 0 |
Only on At-Bay
- At-Bay Specialty Insurance Company (US)
- Markel Corporation (subsidiary) (US)
- HSB Specialty Insurance Company (Munich Re) (US)
Only on Hippo Insurance
- Spinnaker Insurance Company (US)
- Progressive Advantage Agency, Inc. (distribution partner) (US)
- Mountain Re Ltd. (Series 2023-1) — catastrophe bond (Bermuda)
- Notion (smart-home sensor partner) (US)
- SimpliSafe (smart-home / security partner) (US)
- Ring (Amazon) (smart-home partner) (US)
- ADT (smart-home / installed services partner) (US)
- Kangaroo (smart-home sensor partner) (US)
- Lennar Corporation (embedded homebuilder partner / investor) (US)
Counts derived from 15sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.
Stack position
- Generation
- ai-native
- Stack layer
- Underwriting workstation
- Founded
- 2016
- Lines
- commercial, specialty
- Replaces
- manual cyber underwriting, traditional mga submission review
- Generation
- ai-native
- Stack layer
- Underwriting workstation
- Founded
- 2015
- Lines
- home, commercial
- Replaces
- traditional homeowners agent distribution, manual property underwriting
Ownership and corporate context
Carrier-segment specialization
At-Bay — geographic split
- US3
Hippo Insurance — geographic split
- US8
- Bermuda1
Analyst coverage differential
Both covered by
- TechCrunch · At-Bay (2020: Cyber insurance startup At-Bay raises $34M Series C, adds M12 as a new investor) · Hippo Insurance (2020: Understanding Hippo's valuation in a post-Lemonade IPO world)
Only At-Bay cited by
- Insurance Insider US (2025: At-Bay to exit the admitted cyber market, sunsetting its product offering)
- Insurance Journal (2022: Cyber MGA At-Bay Acquires Tech-Solutions Provider Relay)
Only Hippo Insurance cited by
- Bloomberg (via Insurance Journal) (2021: Insurtech Hippo in Talks to Go Public via Merger With SPAC)
- Fortune (2023: Hippo Holdings has SPAC remorse 2 years after the deal that saw the firm valued at $5 billion)
- Seeking Alpha (2021: Hippo Stock: Disruptive But Too Expensive (NYSE:RTPZ))
- S&P Global Market Intelligence (2022: Hippo's stock yet to resurface despite reverse split, layoffs)
Recent news (last 12 months)
No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.
Sourced limitations
- At-Bay is a US-only operator. Cyber policies are placed through At-Bay Specialty Insurance Company (E&S, 44 US states) or through a Markel subsidiary (admitted, 47 states). No UK, EU, or Canadian authorised entity is published. Internationally licensed brokers cannot bind At-Bay capacity directly.Source: At-Bay
- In 2024–2025 At-Bay shuttered its Relay digital placement platform (acquired August 2022), laid off approximately 10% of staff including 25 Israeli R&D roles, and announced the sunset of its admitted cyber product — retrenching to E&S cyber and InsurSec. This signals that the combined 'insurance + MDR' thesis has not yet produced a scalable dual-sided P&L.Source: The Insurer / Cyber Risk Insurer
- At-Bay's claims efficacy data (ransomware frequency, MDR containment times under 15 minutes) is self-reported from its own book via the annual InsurSec Report. Independent validation from Gartner, Forrester, Celent, or Advisen is not published in 2024–2025 cyber insurance quadrants.Source: At-Bay
- Hippo's post-IPO stock performance has been severely impaired. After going public at a $5 billion valuation via SPAC merger with Reinvent Technology Partners Z in August 2021, the stock lost over 90% of its value by 2023. Hippo executed a 1-for-25 reverse stock split and 10% workforce reduction in September 2022 to stabilize the share price, and CEO Rick McCathron publicly stated the company would have fared better with a traditional IPO. Hippo's experience is emblematic of the broader 2021–2022 neoinsurance SPAC cohort collapse (Root, MetroMile, Lemonade).Source: Fortune
- Hippo is a 'carrier-as-tech' hybrid, not a pure software vendor. Its technology stack is bundled with its own balance sheet via Spinnaker Insurance Company. Hippo cannot sell its AI underwriting platform as standalone SaaS to competing carriers; its revenue is tied to written premium, loss ratio, and reinsurance economics — not tech-style recurring software revenue. This structural conflation of tech and insurance risk is part of why public markets have discounted InsurTech valuations.Source: TechCrunch
- Hippo does not appear in publicly indexed Gartner, Forrester, or Celent leader quadrants for homeowners insurance underwriting or policy admin. Its recognition is concentrated in tech/trade press (TechCrunch, Bloomberg, Insurance Journal, Seeking Alpha) and SEC filings rather than independent analyst evaluations of the underwriting workstation or policy admin categories.Source: Seeking Alpha
Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.
Frequently asked
- Do any carriers run both At-Bay and Hippo Insurance?
- Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 12 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Who owns At-Bay and Hippo Insurance?
- At-Bay is independently held. Hippo Insurance is public (NYSE: HIPO).
- Which has more named US carriers?
- Hippo Insurance has the larger publicly-named US roster: At-Bay 3, Hippo Insurance 9. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
- Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
- Both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. At-Bay replaces manual cyber underwriting, traditional mga submission review; Hippo Insurance replaces traditional homeowners agent distribution, manual property underwriting.