phidea
← All tools

Counterpart vs Cytora — Underwriting workstation for US insurance, 2026.

Counterpart (3 named carriers) and Cytora (8 named carriers) both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.

Last verified 2026-04-22 · methodology

TL;DR

  • Counterpart has 3 publicly-named carrier deployments; Cytora has 8. Both at the underwriting workstation layer.
  • Zero customer overlap in the public roster. Counterpart and Cytora are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
  • Both classified ai-native on Phidea's generation axis.
  • Ownership contrast: Counterpart is independently held; Cytora is a subsidiary of Applied Systems.
  • Analyst coverage: 1 firm cover both, 3 only Counterpart, 1 only Cytora.

Customer overlap

BucketCount
Named on Counterpart only3
Named on Cytora only8
Named on both0
of which US-named on at least one side0

Only on Counterpart

  • Markel (Evanston Insurance Company) (US)
  • Aspen Specialty Insurance Company (US)
  • Westfield Specialty (US)

Only on Cytora

  • QBE (AU)
  • AXA XL (UK)
  • MS Amlin (UK)
  • Starr (US)
  • Arch Insurance (BM)
  • Markel (US)
  • Chubb (claims intake) (US)
  • Beazley (US)

Counts derived from 11sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.

Stack position

Counterpart
Generation
ai-native
Stack layer
Underwriting workstation
Founded
2020
Lines
commercial, specialty
Cytora
Generation
ai-native
Stack layer
Underwriting workstation
Founded
2014
Lines
commercial, specialty

Ownership and corporate context

Counterpart
Type
independent

Source: Insurance Journal

Cytora
Type
subsidiary
Parent
Applied Systems
Acquired
2025

Source: Applied Systems

Carrier-segment specialization

Counterpart — geographic split

  • US
    3

Cytora — geographic split

  • US
    4
  • UK
    2
  • AU
    1
  • BM
    1

Analyst coverage differential

Both covered by
  • Carrier Management · Counterpart (2021: Counterpart Pulls in $10M to Expand Management Liability Insurance Platform) · Cytora (2019: By Taming Big Data With AI, Cytora Aims to Transform Commercial Underwriting)
Only Counterpart cited by
  • TechCrunch (2021: Insuretech startup Counterpart raises $10M in funding round led by Valor Equity Partners)
  • The Insurer (2025: Counterpart's Hackett: Five years in, doubling down on agentic insurance, MGA partnerships and AI edge)
  • Insurance Journal (2022: Counterpart Raises $30 Million in Series B Funding Round)
Only Cytora cited by
  • Applied Systems (2026: Cytora launches Autopilot to deliver insurance workflows that run themselves)

Recent news (last 12 months)

No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.

Sourced limitations

Counterpart
  • Counterpart is a managing general agent, not a software vendor. Brokers place business with Counterpart and carriers (Markel, Aspen, Westfield Specialty) cede capacity to it — there is no standalone Counterpart underwriting workstation that a carrier can license. The Agentic Insurance tooling is internal to Counterpart's own book.
    Source: Business Wire
  • Counterpart writes US small and mid-market management and professional liability only — D&O, EPL, Fiduciary, Crime, Miscellaneous Professional Liability and, more recently, Allied Healthcare Professional Liability and Architects & Engineers. It does not underwrite cyber, property, casualty, or personal lines, and the admitted Westfield program is scoped to nonprofits and SMBs.
    Source: Business Wire
  • No Gartner, Celent, Forrester or Novarica coverage of Counterpart appears in public search. Recognition is trade press (TechCrunch, Carrier Management, The Insurer, Insurance Journal, Business Insurance) plus vendor-curated lists (CB Insights Top 50 Insurtech 2024, Inside P&C Underwriting Innovation of the Year 2023) — there is no independent analyst quadrant placement.
    Source: Business Wire
Cytora

No publicly-sourced limitations recorded on the vendor card yet.

Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.

Frequently asked

Do any carriers run both Counterpart and Cytora?
Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 11 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
Who owns Counterpart and Cytora?
Counterpart is independently held. Cytora is a subsidiary of Applied Systems.
Which has more named US carriers?
Cytora has the larger publicly-named US roster: Counterpart 3, Cytora 4. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
Both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. Counterpart operates as a standalone vendor; Cytora operates as a standalone vendor.

Adjacent reading