EIS Group vs Insurity — Policy administration for US insurance, 2026.
EIS Group (12 named carriers) and Insurity (12 named carriers) both sit at the policy administration layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.
Last verified 2026-04-22 · methodology
TL;DR
- EIS Group has 12 publicly-named carrier deployments; Insurity has 12. Both at the policy administration layer.
- Zero customer overlap in the public roster. EIS Group and Insurity are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Both classified modern on Phidea's generation axis.
- Both private-equity ownership.
- Analyst coverage: 1 firm cover both, 2 only EIS Group, 1 only Insurity.
Customer overlap
| Bucket | Count |
|---|---|
| Named on EIS Group only | 12 |
| Named on Insurity only | 12 |
| Named on both | 0 |
| of which US-named on at least one side | 0 |
Only on EIS Group
- CSAA Insurance Group (US)
- Desjardins General Insurance Group (CA)
- AIG Canada (CA)
- Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire (JP)
- Liberty Mutual Benefits (US)
- Wellfleet Insurance (US)
- Industrial Alliance Auto and Home (CA)
- AMI Insurance (NZ)
- Atlantic American Employee Benefits (US)
- Renaissance Life & Health Insurance Company of America (US)
- Reliance Standard (US)
- Tower Insurance (US)
Only on Insurity
- Zurich North America (US)
- N2G Worldwide Insurance Services (US)
- McKee Risk Management (US)
- Orbis Risk Partners (US)
- AmeriTrust (US)
- Amerisure (US)
- Victory Insurance (US)
- Waypoint Mutual (US)
- Juniper Re (US)
- OSC Insurance Services (US)
- Georgia Stern Insurance Agency (US)
- UBIC (US)
Counts derived from 24sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.
Stack position
Ownership and corporate context
Carrier-segment specialization
Analyst coverage differential
Both covered by
- Celent · EIS Group (2025: Celent 2025 P&C Policy Administration Systems Report — EIS named Technology Standout (NA and EMEA)) · Insurity (2023: Policy Administration Systems: P&C Insurance, North America Edition (vendor universe of 19 systems including Insurity))
Only EIS Group cited by
- Gartner (2021: Gartner Magic Quadrant for Life Insurance Policy Administration Systems, North America — EIS positioned as a Leader)
- TPG (2021: Insurance Technology Leader EIS Announces Growth Investment of More than $100 Million from TPG)
Only Insurity cited by
- Novarica (2021: Insurity's Insurance Decisions Suite, Bridge Specialty Suite, Workers' CompXPress, and InsuranceEnterprise All Earn Top Marks in the 2021 Novarica Market Navigator Report for Property & Casualty Policy Administration Systems)
Recent news (last 12 months)
No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.
Sourced limitations
- Many EIS customer references are hosted on EIS's own site or blog rather than third-party case studies. AIG Canada and AMI Insurance are traceable to Celent Model Insurer write-ups; Desjardins, CSAA, Tokio Marine, Wellfleet and Liberty Mutual Benefits references originate from EIS press releases and case studies. Absolute customer count and revenue are not publicly disclosed.Source: EIS Group
- Insurity is not plug-and-play; implementations typically require a third-party systems integrator, and budget planning must include data migration and ongoing support alongside the core license — these usually make up a significant share of first-year spend.Source: Nerdisa
- Insurity's presence in Celent's 2023 North America P&C policy administration report placed it among 19 profiled vendors; the three XCelent awards (Advanced Technology, Breadth of Functionality, Customer Base and Support) went to Guidewire PolicyCenter that cycle.Source: Business Wire
Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.
Frequently asked
- Do any carriers run both EIS Group and Insurity?
- Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 24 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Who owns EIS Group and Insurity?
- EIS Group is PE-owned (TPG (growth investor)). Insurity is PE-owned (GI Partners).
- Which has more named US carriers?
- Insurity has the larger publicly-named US roster: EIS Group 7, Insurity 12. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
- Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
- Both sit at the policy administration layer. EIS Group operates as a standalone vendor; Insurity replaces mainframe policy admin, in house policy admin.