EIS Group vs Slide Insurance — Policy administration for US insurance, 2026.
EIS Group (12 named carriers) and Slide Insurance (3 named carriers) both sit at the policy administration layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.
Last verified 2026-06-01 · methodology
TL;DR
- EIS Group has 12 publicly-named carrier deployments; Slide Insurance has 3. Both at the policy administration layer.
- Zero customer overlap in the public roster. EIS Group and Slide Insurance are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Both classified modern on Phidea's generation axis.
- Ownership contrast: EIS Group is PE-owned (TPG (growth investor)); Slide Insurance is public (SLDE).
- Analyst coverage: 0 firms cover both, 3 only EIS Group, 4 only Slide Insurance.
Customer overlap
| Bucket | Count |
|---|---|
| Named on EIS Group only | 12 |
| Named on Slide Insurance only | 3 |
| Named on both | 0 |
| of which US-named on at least one side | 0 |
Only on EIS Group
- CSAA Insurance Group (US)
- Desjardins General Insurance Group (CA)
- AIG Canada (CA)
- Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire (JP)
- Liberty Mutual Benefits (US)
- Wellfleet Insurance (US)
- Industrial Alliance Auto and Home (CA)
- AMI Insurance (NZ)
- Atlantic American Employee Benefits (US)
- Renaissance Life & Health Insurance Company of America (US)
- Reliance Standard (US)
- Tower Insurance (US)
Only on Slide Insurance
- Farmers Insurance (Truck Insurance Exchange) (US)
- United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (US)
- St. Johns Insurance Company (US)
Counts derived from 16sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.
Stack position
- Generation
- modern
- Stack layer
- Policy administration
- Founded
- 2008
- Lines
- auto, home, commercial, life, health
- Generation
- modern
- Stack layer
- Policy administration
- Founded
- 2021
- Lines
- home
Ownership and corporate context
Carrier-segment specialization
EIS Group — geographic split
- US7
- CA3
- JP1
- NZ1
Slide Insurance — geographic split
- US3
Analyst coverage differential
Only EIS Group cited by
- Celent (2025: Celent 2025 P&C Policy Administration Systems Report — EIS named Technology Standout (NA and EMEA))
- Gartner (2021: Gartner Magic Quadrant for Life Insurance Policy Administration Systems, North America — EIS positioned as a Leader)
- TPG (2021: Insurance Technology Leader EIS Announces Growth Investment of More than $100 Million from TPG)
Only Slide Insurance cited by
- Insurance Journal (2025: Florida's Slide Insurance Files for Initial Public Stock Offering)
- Reuters (2025: Slide valued at over $2.6 billion in debut after biggest insurance IPO of the year)
- Artemis (2026: Slide lifting reinsurance tower to ~$3.5bn for 2026, rate decreases substantial: CEO Lucas)
- Insurance Business (2025: Slide Insurance Q1 profit jumps 51% as Citizens depopulation pays off)
Recent news (last 12 months)
No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.
Sourced limitations
- Many EIS customer references are hosted on EIS's own site or blog rather than third-party case studies. AIG Canada and AMI Insurance are traceable to Celent Model Insurer write-ups; Desjardins, CSAA, Tokio Marine, Wellfleet and Liberty Mutual Benefits references originate from EIS press releases and case studies. Absolute customer count and revenue are not publicly disclosed.Source: EIS Group
- Slide is almost entirely a Florida story. At the end of 2024, 99.5% of its policies were in Florida and 0.5% in South Carolina. That concentration makes the company's results highly sensitive to any single Florida hurricane season. The S-1 filing explicitly names this as the primary business risk.
- Slide carries a Demotech Financial Stability Rating of A, Exceptional — not an AM Best rating. The S-1 warns that the absence of an AM Best rating may limit the company's access to certain reinsurance markets and could affect agent placement decisions in states outside Florida.
- Slide's growth model has relied heavily on bulk policy assumptions from failing carriers and from Citizens depopulation. Those transactions are not recurring on demand — they depend on state regulatory approvals, competitor insolvencies, and the continued availability of Citizens policies eligible for take-out. The Citizens policy count was already shrinking in 2024 (down from an all-time high of nearly 1.5 million).
- Slide writes only personal property lines — single-family homes and condominiums. It does not offer auto, life, commercial P&C, or specialty lines. The company has flagged commercial residential and E&S products as a future ambition, but neither was in market as of the S-1 filing in May 2025.
Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.
Frequently asked
- Do any carriers run both EIS Group and Slide Insurance?
- Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 15 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Who owns EIS Group and Slide Insurance?
- EIS Group is PE-owned (TPG (growth investor)). Slide Insurance is public (SLDE).
- Which has more named US carriers?
- EIS Group has the larger publicly-named US roster: EIS Group 7, Slide Insurance 4. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
- Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
- Both sit at the policy administration layer. EIS Group operates as a standalone vendor; Slide Insurance operates as a standalone vendor.