phidea

FIS Prophet vs Moody's RMS — Actuarial for US insurance, 2026.

FIS Prophet (7 named carriers) and Moody's RMS (5 named carriers) both sit at the actuarial layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.

Last verified 2026-04-22 · methodology

TL;DR

  • FIS Prophet has 7 publicly-named carrier deployments; Moody's RMS has 5. Both at the actuarial layer.
  • Zero customer overlap in the public roster. FIS Prophet and Moody's RMS are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
  • Both classified modern on Phidea's generation axis.
  • Ownership contrast: FIS Prophet is public (NYSE:FIS); Moody's RMS is a subsidiary of Moody's Corporation.
  • Analyst coverage: 1 firm cover both, 1 only FIS Prophet, 1 only Moody's RMS.

Customer overlap

BucketCount
Named on FIS Prophet only7
Named on Moody's RMS only5
Named on both0
of which US-named on at least one side0

Only on FIS Prophet

  • MetLife (US)
  • Singlife with Aviva (SG)
  • AIA Group (HK)
  • New York Life (US)
  • Vienna Insurance Group (AT)
  • Cigna Healthcare (US)
  • State Farm (US)

Only on Moody's RMS

  • Hiscox (UK)
  • MS Amlin (UK)
  • Beazley (UK)
  • Redline Underwriting (UK)
  • Tokio Marine HCC (US)

Counts derived from 13sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.

Stack position

Generation
modern
Stack layer
Actuarial
Founded
1987
Lines
life
Generation
modern
Stack layer
Actuarial
Founded
1988
Lines
auto, home, commercial, specialty, reinsurance

Ownership and corporate context

FIS Prophet
Type
public
Parent
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Acquired
2015
Deal value
$9,100M
Ticker
NYSE:FIS

Source: Business Wire / FIS

Moody's RMS
Type
subsidiary
Parent
Moody's Corporation
Acquired
2021
Deal value
$2,000M
Ticker
NYSE: MCO

Source: Artemis

Carrier-segment specialization

FIS Prophet — geographic split

  • US
    4
  • SG
    1
  • HK
    1
  • AT
    1

Moody's RMS — geographic split

  • UK
    4
  • US
    1

Analyst coverage differential

Both covered by
  • InsuranceERM · FIS Prophet (2021: Actuarial modelling solution of the year: FIS — UK & Europe Awards 2021) · Moody's RMS (2024: Catastrophe risk modelling solution of the year — Moody's (InsuranceERM Annual Awards Americas 2024))
Only FIS Prophet cited by
  • Risk.net (2022: IFRS 17 solution provider of the year: FIS)
Only Moody's RMS cited by
  • Artemis (2021: RMS being sold to Moody's for US$2 billion)

Recent news (last 12 months)

No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.

Sourced limitations

  • Prophet remains a proprietary, license-locked actuarial DSL. Models are written in Prophet's actuarial language and run on FIS's own grid/cloud execution layer; there is no open-source or Python/R native equivalent. FIS's 2024 trade-secrets lawsuit against Montoux — a New Zealand AI startup whose 'Model Replication Module' helped carriers migrate off Prophet — forced Montoux into liquidation in December 2024, illustrating how aggressively FIS defends the installed base against model-extraction and AI-assisted migration tooling.
    Source: Coverager
  • Named-carrier visibility is thin relative to the installed base. FIS claims 10,000+ users at ~850 sites in 65+ countries, but the vast majority of Prophet customers are never publicly disclosed — FIS's corporate award statements tend to name only a small rotating set (AIA, New York Life, Vienna Insurance Group, Generali affiliates, Singlife with Aviva). As with most actuarial modelling software, buyers rely on peer reference calls and SOA/IFoA community knowledge rather than vendor case studies.
  • No Gartner Magic Quadrant or Forrester Wave covers life actuarial modelling as a distinct category. Third-party coverage is concentrated in InsuranceERM and Risk.net awards plus trade-press tech guides. Celent has published insurer cloud-vendor surveys but no dedicated actuarial-modelling Solutionscape for Prophet — buyers lack an analyst ranking and substitute peer networks and consulting firm (Deloitte, Finalyse, Milliman, WTW) recommendations.
    Source: InsuranceERM
  • Catastrophe modelling is a near-duopoly between Moody's RMS and Verisk's AIR Worldwide (now Verisk Extreme Event Solutions). The per-carrier deployment surface is rarely published — most production deployments sit inside a reinsurance broker's placement rather than a carrier press release — so the traction axis on this fiche reflects the aggregate platform-count rather than a named customer list.
    Source: Artemis

Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.

Frequently asked

Do any carriers run both FIS Prophet and Moody's RMS?
Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 12 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
Who owns FIS Prophet and Moody's RMS?
FIS Prophet is public (NYSE:FIS). Moody's RMS is a subsidiary of Moody's Corporation.
Which has more named US carriers?
FIS Prophet has the larger publicly-named US roster: FIS Prophet 4, Moody's RMS 1. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
Both sit at the actuarial layer. FIS Prophet operates as a standalone vendor; Moody's RMS operates as a standalone vendor.

Adjacent reading