Hippo Insurance vs Root Insurance — Underwriting workstation for US insurance, 2026.
Hippo Insurance (9 named carriers) and Root Insurance (5 named carriers) both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.
Last verified 2026-04-22 · methodology
TL;DR
- Hippo Insurance has 9 publicly-named carrier deployments; Root Insurance has 5. Both at the underwriting workstation layer.
- Zero customer overlap in the public roster. Hippo Insurance and Root Insurance are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Both classified ai-native on Phidea's generation axis.
- Both public ownership.
- Analyst coverage: 4 firms cover both, 1 only Hippo Insurance, 1 only Root Insurance.
Customer overlap
| Bucket | Count |
|---|---|
| Named on Hippo Insurance only | 9 |
| Named on Root Insurance only | 5 |
| Named on both | 0 |
| of which US-named on at least one side | 0 |
Only on Hippo Insurance
- Spinnaker Insurance Company (US)
- Progressive Advantage Agency, Inc. (distribution partner) (US)
- Mountain Re Ltd. (Series 2023-1) — catastrophe bond (Bermuda)
- Notion (smart-home sensor partner) (US)
- SimpliSafe (smart-home / security partner) (US)
- Ring (Amazon) (smart-home partner) (US)
- ADT (smart-home / installed services partner) (US)
- Kangaroo (smart-home sensor partner) (US)
- Lennar Corporation (embedded homebuilder partner / investor) (US)
Only on Root Insurance
- Root Insurance Company (US)
- Root Reinsurance Company, Ltd. (Root Re) (KY)
- Homesite Group Incorporated (US)
- Carvana Co. (US)
- Hyundai Capital America (HCA) (US)
Counts derived from 17sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.
Stack position
- Generation
- ai-native
- Stack layer
- Underwriting workstation
- Founded
- 2015
- Lines
- home, commercial
- Replaces
- traditional homeowners agent distribution, manual property underwriting
- Generation
- ai-native
- Stack layer
- Underwriting workstation
- Founded
- 2015
- Lines
- auto, home
- Replaces
- demographic based auto rating, agent distributed auto insurance
Ownership and corporate context
Carrier-segment specialization
Hippo Insurance — geographic split
- US8
- Bermuda1
Root Insurance — geographic split
- US4
- KY1
Analyst coverage differential
Both covered by
- TechCrunch · Hippo Insurance (2020: Understanding Hippo's valuation in a post-Lemonade IPO world) · Root Insurance (2020: Root Seeks $6.34B Valuation In Pending IPO)
- Bloomberg (via Insurance Journal) · Hippo Insurance (2021: Insurtech Hippo in Talks to Go Public via Merger With SPAC) · Root Insurance (2020: Startup Auto Insurer Root Raises $724.4 Million in IPO)
- Seeking Alpha · Hippo Insurance (2021: Hippo Stock: Disruptive But Too Expensive (NYSE:RTPZ)) · Root Insurance (2021: Root Stock: Down 85% From IPO After Q3 Results, Too Speculative)
- S&P Global Market Intelligence · Hippo Insurance (2022: Hippo's stock yet to resurface despite reverse split, layoffs) · Root Insurance (2022: Root shares keep falling despite reverse split; United Insurance up amid exits)
Only Hippo Insurance cited by
- Fortune (2023: Hippo Holdings has SPAC remorse 2 years after the deal that saw the firm valued at $5 billion)
Only Root Insurance cited by
- Insurance Journal (2026: Root Inc. Reports Record 2025 Net Income as Policies Grow)
Recent news (last 12 months)
No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.
Sourced limitations
- Hippo's post-IPO stock performance has been severely impaired. After going public at a $5 billion valuation via SPAC merger with Reinvent Technology Partners Z in August 2021, the stock lost over 90% of its value by 2023. Hippo executed a 1-for-25 reverse stock split and 10% workforce reduction in September 2022 to stabilize the share price, and CEO Rick McCathron publicly stated the company would have fared better with a traditional IPO. Hippo's experience is emblematic of the broader 2021–2022 neoinsurance SPAC cohort collapse (Root, MetroMile, Lemonade).Source: Fortune
- Hippo is a 'carrier-as-tech' hybrid, not a pure software vendor. Its technology stack is bundled with its own balance sheet via Spinnaker Insurance Company. Hippo cannot sell its AI underwriting platform as standalone SaaS to competing carriers; its revenue is tied to written premium, loss ratio, and reinsurance economics — not tech-style recurring software revenue. This structural conflation of tech and insurance risk is part of why public markets have discounted InsurTech valuations.Source: TechCrunch
- Hippo does not appear in publicly indexed Gartner, Forrester, or Celent leader quadrants for homeowners insurance underwriting or policy admin. Its recognition is concentrated in tech/trade press (TechCrunch, Bloomberg, Insurance Journal, Seeking Alpha) and SEC filings rather than independent analyst evaluations of the underwriting workstation or policy admin categories.Source: Seeking Alpha
- Root's post-IPO stock performance collapsed from 2020 through 2022. Priced at $27 in the October 28, 2020 NASDAQ IPO (raising $724.4M), the stock had fallen approximately 85% by late 2021 as the company booked ~$415M of net losses in the first nine months of 2021 and accumulated close to $1.2B in losses by Q3 2021. Root executed a 1-for-18 reverse stock split in August 2022 (closing at $0.95 the day before), and in January 2022 laid off 330 employees (~20% of staff) as part of an organizational realignment. Recovery came only via a multi-year turnaround that produced Root's first profitable quarter in Q3 2024.Source: Carrier Management
- Root's operating insurer (Root Insurance Company, domiciled in Ohio) is rated B- (Fair) by A.M. Best with a Stable outlook — materially below the A/A+ ratings held by national incumbents (GEICO, Progressive, State Farm, Allstate). A B- rating signals fair but more adverse-condition-sensitive ability to meet obligations, and can limit Root's appeal to risk-averse consumers, lenders, and reinsurance counterparties comparing carrier financial strength.Source: Bankrate
- Root does not appear in publicly indexed Gartner, Forrester, or Celent leader quadrants for auto underwriting, telematics, or policy admin. Recognition is concentrated in tech/trade press (TechCrunch, Insurance Journal, Carrier Management, Bloomberg), equity research (Seeking Alpha, Motley Fool, S&P Global Market Intelligence), and SEC filings rather than independent analyst evaluations of underwriting workstation or telematics categories. Root is a vertically integrated carrier, not a software vendor, so its tech is not available as standalone SaaS to competing insurers.Source: Seeking Alpha
Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.
Frequently asked
- Do any carriers run both Hippo Insurance and Root Insurance?
- Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 14 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Who owns Hippo Insurance and Root Insurance?
- Hippo Insurance is public (NYSE: HIPO). Root Insurance is public (NASDAQ: ROOT).
- Which has more named US carriers?
- Hippo Insurance has the larger publicly-named US roster: Hippo Insurance 9, Root Insurance 4. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
- Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
- Both sit at the underwriting workstation layer. Hippo Insurance replaces traditional homeowners agent distribution, manual property underwriting; Root Insurance replaces demographic based auto rating, agent distributed auto insurance.