Insurity vs Slide Insurance — Policy administration for US insurance, 2026.
Insurity (12 named carriers) and Slide Insurance (3 named carriers) both sit at the policy administration layer. Zero customer overlap in the public roster — they are addressing different segments of the same stack layer.
Last verified 2026-06-01 · methodology
TL;DR
- Insurity has 12 publicly-named carrier deployments; Slide Insurance has 3. Both at the policy administration layer.
- Zero customer overlap in the public roster. Insurity and Slide Insurance are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Both classified modern on Phidea's generation axis.
- Ownership contrast: Insurity is PE-owned (GI Partners); Slide Insurance is public (SLDE).
- Analyst coverage: 0 firms cover both, 2 only Insurity, 4 only Slide Insurance.
Customer overlap
| Bucket | Count |
|---|---|
| Named on Insurity only | 12 |
| Named on Slide Insurance only | 3 |
| Named on both | 0 |
| of which US-named on at least one side | 0 |
Only on Insurity
- Zurich North America (US)
- N2G Worldwide Insurance Services (US)
- McKee Risk Management (US)
- Orbis Risk Partners (US)
- AmeriTrust (US)
- Amerisure (US)
- Victory Insurance (US)
- Waypoint Mutual (US)
- Juniper Re (US)
- OSC Insurance Services (US)
- Georgia Stern Insurance Agency (US)
- UBIC (US)
Only on Slide Insurance
- Farmers Insurance (Truck Insurance Exchange) (US)
- United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (US)
- St. Johns Insurance Company (US)
Counts derived from 16sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.
Stack position
- Generation
- modern
- Stack layer
- Policy administration
- Founded
- 1985
- Lines
- auto, home, commercial, workers-comp, specialty
- Replaces
- mainframe policy admin, in house policy admin
- Generation
- modern
- Stack layer
- Policy administration
- Founded
- 2021
- Lines
- home
Ownership and corporate context
Carrier-segment specialization
Insurity — geographic split
- US12
Slide Insurance — geographic split
- US3
Analyst coverage differential
Only Insurity cited by
- Novarica (2021: Insurity's Insurance Decisions Suite, Bridge Specialty Suite, Workers' CompXPress, and InsuranceEnterprise All Earn Top Marks in the 2021 Novarica Market Navigator Report for Property & Casualty Policy Administration Systems)
- Celent (2023: Policy Administration Systems: P&C Insurance, North America Edition (vendor universe of 19 systems including Insurity))
Only Slide Insurance cited by
- Insurance Journal (2025: Florida's Slide Insurance Files for Initial Public Stock Offering)
- Reuters (2025: Slide valued at over $2.6 billion in debut after biggest insurance IPO of the year)
- Artemis (2026: Slide lifting reinsurance tower to ~$3.5bn for 2026, rate decreases substantial: CEO Lucas)
- Insurance Business (2025: Slide Insurance Q1 profit jumps 51% as Citizens depopulation pays off)
Recent news (last 12 months)
No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.
Sourced limitations
- Insurity is not plug-and-play; implementations typically require a third-party systems integrator, and budget planning must include data migration and ongoing support alongside the core license — these usually make up a significant share of first-year spend.Source: Nerdisa
- Insurity's presence in Celent's 2023 North America P&C policy administration report placed it among 19 profiled vendors; the three XCelent awards (Advanced Technology, Breadth of Functionality, Customer Base and Support) went to Guidewire PolicyCenter that cycle.Source: Business Wire
- Slide is almost entirely a Florida story. At the end of 2024, 99.5% of its policies were in Florida and 0.5% in South Carolina. That concentration makes the company's results highly sensitive to any single Florida hurricane season. The S-1 filing explicitly names this as the primary business risk.
- Slide carries a Demotech Financial Stability Rating of A, Exceptional — not an AM Best rating. The S-1 warns that the absence of an AM Best rating may limit the company's access to certain reinsurance markets and could affect agent placement decisions in states outside Florida.
- Slide's growth model has relied heavily on bulk policy assumptions from failing carriers and from Citizens depopulation. Those transactions are not recurring on demand — they depend on state regulatory approvals, competitor insolvencies, and the continued availability of Citizens policies eligible for take-out. The Citizens policy count was already shrinking in 2024 (down from an all-time high of nearly 1.5 million).
- Slide writes only personal property lines — single-family homes and condominiums. It does not offer auto, life, commercial P&C, or specialty lines. The company has flagged commercial residential and E&S products as a future ambition, but neither was in market as of the S-1 filing in May 2025.
Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.
Frequently asked
- Do any carriers run both Insurity and Slide Insurance?
- Not in Phidea's public roster. Across 15 sourced carrier-deployment entries on both vendor cards, zero carriers appear on both. The two tools are addressing different carriers within the same stack layer.
- Who owns Insurity and Slide Insurance?
- Insurity is PE-owned (GI Partners). Slide Insurance is public (SLDE).
- Which has more named US carriers?
- Insurity has the larger publicly-named US roster: Insurity 12, Slide Insurance 4. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
- Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
- Both sit at the policy administration layer. Insurity replaces mainframe policy admin, in house policy admin; Slide Insurance operates as a standalone vendor.