phidea
← All tools

Jupiter Intelligence vs Planck — Data platform for US insurance, 2026.

Jupiter Intelligence (8 named carriers) and Planck (5 named carriers) both sit at the data platform layer. 1 carrier appear on both rosters.

Last verified 2026-05-27 · methodology

TL;DR

  • Jupiter Intelligence has 8 publicly-named carrier deployments; Planck has 5. Both at the data platform layer.
  • 1 carrier run both: Chubb.
  • Both classified ai-native on Phidea's generation axis.
  • Ownership contrast: Jupiter Intelligence is independently held; Planck is a subsidiary of Applied Systems.
  • Analyst coverage: 0 firms cover both, 4 only Jupiter Intelligence, 2 only Planck.

Customer overlap

BucketCount
Named on Jupiter Intelligence only7
Named on Planck only4
Named on both1
of which US-named on at least one side1

Overlap roster

Only on Jupiter Intelligence

  • MS&AD Insurance Group (Japan)
  • Liberty Mutual (US)
  • Zurich Insurance Group (Switzerland)
  • Aon (Global)
  • Lloyd's syndicates (Lloyd's Lab Cohort 6) (UK)
  • Nephila Capital (Bermuda)
  • QBE Insurance Group (Australia)

Only on Planck

  • Great American Insurance Group — Republic Indemnity (US)
  • AIG — Attune (US)
  • Sompo (JP)
  • Nationwide Insurance (US)

Counts derived from 13sourced carrier-deployment entries across both vendor cards. Aggregate-only statements (e.g. “16 of the top 20”) excluded.

Stack position

Jupiter Intelligence
Generation
ai-native
Stack layer
Data platform
Founded
2017
Lines
home, commercial, specialty, reinsurance
Planck
Generation
ai-native
Stack layer
Data platform
Founded
2016
Lines
commercial, specialty
Replaces
manual underwriter web research

Ownership and corporate context

Jupiter Intelligence
Type
independent

Source: GlobeNewswire

Planck
Type
subsidiary
Parent
Applied Systems
Acquired
2024
Deal value
$300M

Source: Ctech

Carrier-segment specialization

Jupiter Intelligence — geographic split

  • Japan
    1
  • US
    1
  • Switzerland
    1
  • US/Global
    1
  • Global
    1
  • UK
    1
  • Bermuda
    1
  • Australia
    1

Planck — geographic split

  • US
    4
  • JP
    1

Analyst coverage differential

Only Jupiter Intelligence cited by
  • Reinsurance News (2020: Climate data start-up Jupiter raises capital from Liberty Mutual, MS&AD)
  • Axios (2021: Climate risk analytics company Jupiter Intelligence raises $54 million)
  • InsTech London (2021: In conversation with Jupiter Intelligence)
  • Lloyd's of London (2021: Jupiter Intelligence — Lloyd's Lab Alumni (Cohort 6))
Only Planck cited by
  • Duck Creek (2023: Planck — Duck Creek partner directory entry)
  • Insurance Business America (2021: Planck: Finding the truth about SMEs)

Recent news (last 12 months)

No news items in the last 12 months for either tool.

Sourced limitations

Jupiter Intelligence
  • Jupiter does not underwrite, broker, or transfer risk. It sells data and analytics. A carrier still has to plug the output into its own pricing models, accumulation tools, and reinsurance treaties for it to change a quote, a portfolio cap, or a treaty cession.
    Source: Jupiter Intelligence
  • All forward-looking climate analytics carry uncertainty from emissions scenarios, climate-model spread, and downscaling assumptions. Jupiter itself acknowledges in the InsTech interview that future climate analytics have multiple sources of uncertainty, which it tries to surface transparently rather than collapse into a single number.
    Source: InsTech
  • Jupiter's published customer base skews toward banking, asset management, energy, and large corporates. On the insurance side most named relationships are with companies that are also investors (Liberty Mutual, MS&AD, QBE, Nephila); independent commercial references from primary US P&C carriers outside this investor circle are not publicly disclosed.
    Source: GlobeNewswire
  • No placement in Gartner, Forrester, Celent, or Novarica leader quadrants for insurance climate-risk or physical-risk analytics as of May 2026. Third-party recognition is concentrated in trade press (Reinsurance News, Carrier Management, Commercial Risk, InsTech), tech press (Axios, TechCrunch), and the Lloyd's Lab Cohort 6 alumni listing.
    Source: Axios
Planck

No publicly-sourced limitations recorded on the vendor card yet.

Limitations published on Phidea are sourced to the underlying citation and reflect what is publicly named — not an exhaustive list. Consult the vendor card for the full record.

Frequently asked

Do any carriers run both Jupiter Intelligence and Planck?
Yes — 1 carrier appear on both rosters: Chubb. Sourced on each vendor card; see the customer-overlap section for primary URLs.
Who owns Jupiter Intelligence and Planck?
Jupiter Intelligence is independently held. Planck is a subsidiary of Applied Systems.
Which has more named US carriers?
Planck has the larger publicly-named US roster: Jupiter Intelligence 1, Planck 4. Public-roster size is a coverage signal, not a quality signal — vendors with stronger NDAs may have larger actual US footprints than the public count shows.
Where are these tools positioned in the insurance stack?
Both sit at the data platform layer. Jupiter Intelligence operates as a standalone vendor; Planck replaces manual underwriter web research.

Adjacent reading